>>3405016>I asked to show me a cheap setup THAT GIVES GOOD QUALITY digitized film photos. You didn't. You posted a potato from a V600.The v600 bro is a different anon that ain't me chief.
>That's my point. Cheap or good quality, pick one.>Plustek 7200 still won't give great quality.How stupid are you? I gave you both, the Plustek 7200 has the same specs as the 8100 which I bloody use in all examples I posted, the 8100 comes with newer software that's all. You can get a 7200 for $150 used.
>Not interested in seeing more potato examples,Look at
>>3404756 >>3403817 (You) and pic related (more el cheapo Gold 400) tell me they ain't good fucking quality.
>as I already know what the V600 is capable of having owned one. It made me stop shooting 35mm.>gets into film>buys shitty shatbed>throws a tantrum when the results are shitImagine being (You)
>So yeah, like I originally said. $500 minimum in purchasesThat was never in your original post but whatever lets do this, all prices from B&H besides camera/scanner arefrom second hand markets:
>$50 camera>$150 used Plustek 7200 >$32.50 Tetenal 1L C41 kit>$28.50 Paterson tank>$47.94 for 18 rolls Fuji c200 36 exp. (the amount I can dev from the 1L C41 kit)$308.95 total.
With the left over cash I can buy 2 more c41 kits and 36 more rolls of c200 and still have $30 left.
Seriously can't tell if you're just being a ignorant fuck or just straight up trolling at this point
