>>3834322I mean, it's also one of things i consider. X100T is my favorite pick in theory, i want to give this one a try the most. 16mpx isn't much, and in general i feel like the less mpx camera has, the more pleasant noise tends to be. I've pixel-peeped in various reviews and it turned out that x100f has this issue where dark frames are showing phase detection AF area on higher ISO (pic related). It's probably a non-issue in real life use, but i wonder if it would force me to, for example, take dark frame to substract it every time i'm taking a long exposure night photo.
Ordinary X100T photo samples look great though. So yeah, maybe i'll get x100t? Or maybe i'll even screw it all and get x100v, it looks brilliant in every way possible but I dislike carrying expensive cameras around (plus, i feel like i don't deserve good hardware yet). No idea yet, it's not like i'm dead-set on x100t, there is a good chance it isn't as good as i think it is.
