>>3277870>unironically possessing so little reading comprehension that you think I'm calling the focal length itself too wide, rather than critiquing the use of a polarizer on a lens/scene/lighting/subject combination that draws your attention to the visual imperfections the filter is prone to cause in large skiesOh you little dullard idiot, no. Do you see how ugly the transition from deep blue in the upper right to pale blue in the lower left frame of the sky is? That's because of the angle of polarization he used, which is not complimentary to the image.
It being a 55mm instead of a MUCH wider lens is why it's not even MORE obvious (like pic related) but it is nevertheless an eyesore to people with visual competency to do with polarizers and their effects
