>>3852655That's only because Canon is the go to brand for commercial photography so all the middle aged professional use it. They dress in their excess hiking gear or in their generic mens wearhouse suit after they arrive in joggers and new balances.
>>3852659That's not what I said. I said that people who use Sony are mostly all the same and predictable. I never said the camera was personality, just that a lot of people with the same personality or none at all use x brand.
>>3852669No I bought a different brand because I like the quality of the other brand better as well as the user feedback.
>>3852801LOL
>>3852800That's what I mean. The brand has no identity except for the lame coom and brotographers that use it. The company has no identity and so its lame users are who they market it to. People buy it because "it's sony" not because of the product itself, but the brand they trust in.
>>3854391Most people cannot grasp this. The hardware isn't bad at all. It's the software that is atrocious. It could be better, but like I said its about selling cameras not about building a beloved piece of equipment.
>>3852814gaystation eh
