>>3073798>Stop pretending you shoot sports or anything requiring lightning fast reflexes>ignores my entire method of making money is shooting dark, high end nightlife environments chock full of dynamic lighting changes and instant reflexes mixed with knowledge of settings to overcome the sudden drop and burst of lasersYea, ok.
>>3073799And how long does that film negative take to make a useable print versus a client who wants 150 photos next day and pays $600/weekend for your services to get drunk and party with them and take photos to show what NYC is about?
>>3073801How many posts will it take to realize JPEG + RAW is a more file-size costly solution than shooting RAW to begin with and having a decent size card since on the A99II, I trade downsampling to control noise by allowing massive RAW file sizes that JPEG + RAW only eats into when hmm.... I could just LR + two clicks and be done..?
Noobs.
You all are pathetic, please shoot half as much as I have these last 9 years purely on digital to think your film knowledge even applies. You all need to attend a Ken Rockwell class, you're out of touch, I'm out of sight.
Pic related: I shoot Hotel Z, Highline Ballroom, Gansevoort Hotel, and a few other places where I don't move until a $5k VIP is booked :>)
Get rekt noobs.