Shooting travel and landscapes and deciding about the next system which should I buy. APS-C vs 4/3.
I was thinking about getting fuji x-s20 with 18-55mm f2.8-4.0 and 55-200mm F3.5-4.8, but all of that weights almost 1.5kg. Carrying that all day with me in my backpack for a couple of weeks doesn't sound fun.
I've just realized that I'm mostly using apertures smaller than 6, so I won't benefit much from bigger brighter lenses. So maybe 4/3 would be a better option?
Are there good lightweight setups in 4/3" area? Would the weight saving be worth getting smaller sensor?
I'm planning mostly shooting handheld if that's any difference.
As an alternative also looking at OM-5 + 12-35mm F2.8 II ASPH Power OIS + M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R - little bit under 1kg of gear.
The image quality for OM-5 isn't that bad in comparison to APS-C in low light:
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=lowlight&attr13_0=omsystem_om5&attr13_1=fujifilm_xs10&attr13_2=panasonic_dmclx100&attr13_3=sony_a6700&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=12800&attr16_1=12800&attr16_2=12800&attr16_3=12800&attr126_0=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.32048638895426373&y=0.59215926288686030,5kg less with me. Is it worth picking 4/3"?
