>>3496442I don't see you advancing any profs to the contrary. The way it is seen here and elesewhere is that it's just a different system. Smaller sensor, but it's much faster. Pluses and minuses. The lenses that really matter are there, so you see people taking superb shots with it. If you wish to argue that in depth, you may do so, but I only see you repeating blank, disproven statements.
>>3496443What about this one? High end quality, or you'll dismiss it on exif? Do you dare to assess?
