>>4153247great job on the hair, background, and lips. i'd personally blast the post-processed face once with a really soft eraser at ~25% opacity, and leave the eyes as-is. the whiteness of the dress flowers also got lost. assuming before = left and after = right
>>4153266this is a man. the added warmth is questionable. it distorted the tree color, brought out the masculine bone structure, and blew out the sunlight. also the fire sign removal is rather clumsy (you can see the pixels)
pic: auto white balance, subtle curves adjust, unsharp mask. the before side is *after* focus stacking
