>>4223202I was expecting what the manufacturer (spooler) says on their website "Shot at 400 ISO and pushed +2 stops in development, the film exhibits accurate colours and an almost grainless look, typically associated with films like Kodak Ektar 100 or Kodak Portra 160." now because it's underexposed by two stops shadows are all green and high contrast scenes look like shit. Having a uncalibrated laptop screen for editing doesn't help.
>>4223222thanks
