>fuck up and take half-frame shot in portrait when i should have went with landscape>attempt to salvage framing by cropping in to landscape, demolishing visual resolution in the processi am a visionary pioneering the 35mm equivalent of micro four thirds
>>4393014>If I get my negatives back from the drug storeread these words in isolation then do your homework to make damn sure that "if" is for sure a "when" before your hand over your film. CVS (and probably every other major chain) will mail your film off to a central processing center to be developed, scanned, and then disposed of all in one go.
>>4393004>why even spend money on film if its going to look like a nikon coolpixso i'm free to take photos without a screen beckoning me to immediately review what i've just shot in case something spoiled it and i need to reshoot. there's also the added bonus of using a purely mechanical camera which doesn't rely on batteries that need charging or tons of esoteric electronic components that are impossible to service.
for what it's worth though i do find charm in early digishit photos, i like being able to see the world through the eyes of different technologies. i have no interest in capturing the world as my own eyes see it.
