>>4106491I cant just post an image and say "this is exactly how ektachrome would look" youd need an actual film image too to compare and for transparency i'd need to take the digital image first , apply the preset, then take the image on film, wait for the film to be developed comeback and see if it matches. Thatd be the truest way to show results, which i already said here
>>4106486as of right now i can show you the preset on an already existing image.
The top is film and the bottom is digital
also where did you see it was made to emulate digital?
