>>4311767>maybe they took you for a hippie or a communistare you americans really this retarded?
>that guy is taking photos>he's probably plotting to organize the working class and take the means of productionstop being such a paranoid illiterate faggot
anyway
>i think it's now normal for people to not understand filmyes, more than once I've taken pictures of 20-something yo people, so I thought they'd be familiar with film photography
I'm in my late 20's and I remember taking rolls to develop with my father until I was like 12 or something. But I guess people just forget stuff, we just know about it because we shoot film
>allegedly'cause I ain't seeing much photos
>>4311796you can shoot digital and then edit a lot, use presets, add texture for grain etc.
it'll never be the same, though
because it's not
but like... why not just shoot film?
and if not shooting film, why try to emulate it? just as a gimmick? that's kinda pointless
