>>3309671This is gud, but I wonder if you could've better utilized the shadows as a compositional element by changing your position.
>>3309673I see why you did this, and I want it to be neat...but it isn't. Too empty and the emptiness doesn't convey a sense of scale or depth in a way that contributes to the image...it's just deadspace.
>>3309674I think loosing the 3 cloest columns and whatever headroom to keep the aspect ratio the same will give a stronger image. As is, the guy is too squished into the side and the reflections in the closest windows disrupt the repetitive geometry of the building.
Don't mind me, I'm just a gearfag who only takes photos of his gear.
