>>2975124So much of this griping is literally retarded, you're asking it to be like 3 different systems at once and then sarcastically trashing it when it doesn't fulfil stupid criteria. The 50-140 f2.8 is a great lens, sharp wide open. Same goes for the 55-200, 90mm, 60mm, 35 f2, 23mm f1.4 & 16mm. All great lenses. No shit it's APS-C so you lose a bit of equivalent aperture but the noise level is pretty great despite it so who gives a shit. The guy mentions tonnes of great features and all you can return is "Nuh uhhhh!!" Samyang 12mm, another great lens. Autofocus is a satisfactory sacrifice because of the CoC/DoF and brings a great price and image quality. With your iso comment i'm not sure if you're trolling but Fuji Iso 200 is more like iso 125, and they do it for increased dynamic range. You're not really loosing anything unless you shoot jpeg because given the raw data you can change the tonemapping. But I'm sure as a total pro who turns his nose up at an f4 70-200mm you already know that. X-t X-p and X-e can all have aftermarket grips, and if you don't like those there's also third party ones. You're saying so much literally spastic shit I hope these aren't your actual opinions
>>7mm undistorted crop doesn't exist>What do you think the actual fl of the lens on your phone is? Or on any small sensor deviceI mean come on dumbshit you can't actually think that was a clever thing to say in that context right?