>>3604646>>3604650Thanks, those are all fair points. I appreciate the feedback. I think I keep being drawn to shots like
>>3601696 because I liked the details of the mist rolling over the land, but then felt like that area being dark+containing detail made it "heavy" and needed to be offset by twice as much "light"/negative space, but I can see why that makes for a more boring shot.
Funnily enough
>>3604641 is probably the most processed shot in the thread.
>https://gofile.io/?c=TXBX22 I knew what I wanted to do with it when I was taking it, but when I'm editing and flick between before/after, seeing too much change always makes me feel compelled to reign things back in. I still really struggle with finding a balance of too much vs. not enough editing. Then there's a dumb boomer shot like
>>3602591 where I actually did very little to it at all and it looks over saturated, though a lot of that is the meme-y composition I guess.
