>>3483906>no need to projectNot one drop of projection. You doubling down on your terrible advice is proof positive that you're a horrible person.
>But since he clearly hasn't bothered to do any of that before posting here I'm giving him the tier of advice I think he might actually doYou're pretty dumb if you think someone who you think can't be bothered to read over some tutorial, watch some quick video, or even read one of those single page guides like attached is going to go through the exif in a bunch of their cameras and try to figure out the rhyme or reason behind those settings the camera chose?
>t's perfectly fine to shoot auto if you know nothing, you can still learn composition and get a good photo.Might have wanted to spend a little more time with that instead of "look at the numbers that your camera picked and hope you can figure out what priority was given to what setting, and oh, btw, I'm not even going to tell you the main three to look at for this to almost make sense.
>Why not use the tools at your disposal that makes sense for your level of knowledge?Reverse engineering the effects of a single set of triangle settings with no other information or knowledge of how they work is doesn't remotely "make sense for your level of knowledge".
Go be horrible elsewhere, please.
