>>4151869>>4151862Based. It honestly takes more talent to make a good photo with a smaller sensor.
>Content needs to be so good no one cares how small the photo is>Camera is so bad you need flash or to be outside around the middle of the day>Lenses are so soft that you can't rely on physical or digital zoom to get "closer" and have to actually get closer to your subjectBut as a reward for your talent and ability to make the most of a bad situation, you are spared from such idiocy as spending $6000 on a crop medium format, or god forbid, lugging around a DSLR.
As for the normies, I guess they can over-spend ever so slightly on fool frames and oversized "high end" scam four thirds that promise more dynamic range, fancier autofocus, and more megapixels so they can salvage their garbage cat snapshits.
