(2/2)
>>3870526>Mft is 2 stops noiser than FF at the same iso, if I have to drop down 2 stops on FF to match the dof of mft, then which one is noisier poppet? (And which one has the greater resolution and colour depth ;). )If you match the DoF then the noise is the same, but then you raise shutter speed by two stops as you said and you get 2 stops more noise as a result.
>Fov and dof are subjectiveWho are you quoting?
Which one is the "correct" FoV and DoF for a given length and f-number is subjective.
>Here's an article from 2006 talking about the lack of cad for optics, dumb-dumbJames Gilbert Baker was doing computer-aided lens design back in the late 40s. Vivitar of all brands was using computers to design lenses in the 70s and bragged about it all the time.
>Yes it is, and no it isn't, takes 10 mins to Dev a roll.>implying time spent is the only hasslelol
>You really are proving yourself angry and stupid cutie.Look at the mirror. You're not as intelligent as you think you are.
