>>4232346>>4232347>>4232348>It was shot on 5263 (if that's the right number), a 500 speed low saturation and low contrast stock (even lower than vision expression at the time), AFAIK the stock lasted for about a year or two until it was discontinued for some reason.>In the Kodak DVD documentary it is mentioned that they shot the film on the limits of underexposure latitude (they rated it higher than 500ISO at times), which is probably what made it grainy.>The DP didn't say it like that, he said something like "the stock is faster than what reads on the box",>Some of the underexposurer was intentionally done to reduce color saturation. DP Lance Accord talks about this in the book "New Cinematographers", saying that they shot some night exteriors at T4 or 5.6 because he felt that it gave the color saturation a softer quality. And Filip is right, they shot on 5263 which has been discontinued for awhile, not sure how long it was on the market for.TLDR: It was shot on KODAK VISION 5263 / 7263 500T color negative film. Which was a very short lived film stock. I don't know if a pre-existing simulation for it exists.
https://125px.com/docs/motionpicture/kodak/5263.pdf 