>>4013923Am I, anon? You see a single photo and assume, Exposure is very important, it is also very subjective. While I've already agreed it is slightly underexposed, It's not like you can't make out any details, I'm no expert, Nor did I claim to be, But I'm far from new. I am also quite happy with my dslr system, I focus on catching moments, Not missing them trying to find "the right settings", I can fix pretty much every small oversight or mistake I make In less than a minute in C1. So if it's not critical, Why wouldn't I just get it close and fix it in post?
>>4013974Exposure is very subjective anon, Like I said, I've been critiqued already, So at least add something.
>inb4 it's underexposed No, It's not.
