>>4156737Same lol, he got infected by his camera. Many such cases, sad!
>>4156731Even without peeping the textures look all fucked up, like poorly developed film stock where the one in charge got careless with temperatures and fractured the emulsion.
>And sony isn't shit in a way that's relevant outside of arbitrary dick measuring contests. Literally, dick measuring contests. Everyone in the real world thinks the cameras are fine, and competitors didn't even exist until after the R3 and just before the RIV so oh lol they're better compared to the older stuff that made them enter the market segment? Big dealSony cameras have shitty ergonomics, a shitty mount, shitty weather sealing, shitty filter stacks, PDAF artifacts and more. I won't hate on the stabilization because as shit as it is, my camera has none if I don't put a stabilized lens on it. But yeah Sony cameras suck and I'd rather use a Sigma than a fucking Sony. At least they don't have a baby mount and offer something in return for having to use a tiny TV, lol.
