>>3104966>same generation and same factory as the sensor used in the xt2doesn't make sense, it's not the same sensor.
>No, read about fuji cheating iso, when you take that into account it's very nearly 2 stops.nah, every brand calculates iso differently. eg, sony overexposes about ½ stop comparing to nikon. fuji underexposes to preserve hilights.
>OK buddy, people are buying the otus because they want that premium manual focus experience then?not what I meant. despite theoretical possibility of increased sharpness the real world difference is negligible, limited by other factors like sonyshuttershake (tm) and people who cross shop a7 and xt2 are not interested in mf level of detail.
>without af or electronic aperture mostly concerns ef lenses, but sure.
>correct fovaaaahahahhahahaa
>Shown to focus faster with canon lenses than the best canon bodiesa lie
>can also use the old sigma eos lenses that new canon bodies can't.no one gives a shit about those shitters
>no eye-af, a feature already unique to sony, that's it.and reduced fps on the new a9. btw, my x-t1 has eye detection af, works great!
>gratz, you have one third party supplier, a 3rd party supplier that's known for being worse than metz/yongnuo/godox/everyone else,one is plenty in addition to first party metz flashes when you can use decades worth of manual flashes. like you should if you know what you're doing.
>still no off camera flash optionI use off cam flashes all the time
>oh and nissin had to disable HSS on their fuji mount flashes because fuji don't offer support for HSS.a lie. you can update you nissin flashes to hss.
> with fuji you're stuck with a single ethos; small, fast, soft until f7.1, unusable wide open.once again, complete bullshit. small and fast, fast af and very usable.
>With Sony you have a lens for every occasion, and they're all tack sharp from wide openhahahahaha no. your confirmation bias is showing
