>>3823062Nah it's true. Even Kodak issued a warning.
The newest CT-like scanners fuck it up, even slow ISO100 film. You can tell the scanners from appearance easily.
On the plus side - I guess lots of people complained about ruined film - I saw an attitude change from security personnel. Now they're willing to hand check, while in the past they wouldn't entertain the thought 99% of the time.
>[citation needed]https://twitter.com/KodakProFilmBiz/status/1221780012644302849