>>4336665This same website "says" that that niggon APS-C has the same DR as the G9II
In real life, it's noisier even at base ISO
That is because these charts are not adjusted for real sensitivity or sensor area, nor do they actually indicate how many stops of real dynamic range you have. "Photographic dynamic range" is ironically named because it does not correspond to photography. At all.
They are invalid for comparing cameras, and invalid for deciding if a camera has sufficient real world dynamic range. They are only good for knowing where the sensor switches to another gain circuit or if bill was better at this, when the firmware turns on NR (the gear homo can't actually detect all forms of NR, or isn't an honest reviewer, or else the G9II would be nothing but triangles in line with its visibly smeared noise, just like the A9II)
Since all mfturds can post is charts here's a chart to stay on topic lmao!
