>>3850017No, I'm not choosing looks. I'm choosing an experience. If anything I'd say people who go for rangefinders are going for a look. The recent Pentax video they put out had a segment dedicated to this that resonated with me like few other things. The light that's going to hit the sensor hits your eyes before you release the shutter. The camera becomes an extension of yourself. It's a beautiful thing. Like having a telescope with the ability to capture what you're seeing. If I had to pick between the three in pic related, I'd go for either the Leica or the Hasselblad. And if you switched them for a Canon 6D II or a Nikon D610 I'd still pick the reflex cameras despite their technical inferiority. Specially nowadays that it seems DSLRs could go extinct. Who the hell wants to miss out on the reflex experience? Bugmen, that's who.
>muh sharpnessNegligible difference.
>the budget of a hassyMaybe he prefers the system. There probably were some technical improvements over the years specially dealing with ergonomics and maybe some quirks of the Hasselblad got corrected.
I'd still rather have a Hasselblad 2000FC.
