>>3423228"I can never get it to look good" implies I can never get it to look good in my own eyes, because I don't like how Portra looks in the first place. Why the fuck does everyone on this site take everything literal? I didn't like how it rendered whites/white skin tones, or how it looked in natural lighting. Pic related is one of the only photos where I've liked the colours from Portra (ye I know it's a shit photos fugg offf mane). Gold 400 has given be better looking skin tones than Portra 400 in similar lighting conditions (both point and shoots with direct flash)
>>3422030 I love how no one even saw that post.
Shot a roll of 400 @3200 which I still need to develop which has a few people shots in it, will post when its deved but I'm out of C412 chems so who knows when I'll get around to doing that.
