>>3455273>Minimal water on my Sony a7ii and it friedMan, that's why I ALWAYS pick Canon over Sony. Superior weather sealing, that's the make or break thing that Sony fanbois just don't understand. These are TOOLS for work, and if the tools don't work when held up to even the slightest weather, what are they?? Toys, they're just toys. Sony fanbois, don't know a real camera, they just sit there and tinker with their toy cameras. They think they have real FF cameras, but a clear look at the sensor and mount will reveal that they have a MUCH worse mount than Canon. The edge of the mount actually hangs OVER the sensor!!! Can you believe that? Sony clearly didn't have full frame in mind when they built the emount. Canon on the other hand purpose built the rf mount as a full frame mount from the ground up. Who knows, maybe even in the future they MIGHT, just might be able to fit a medium format sensor in there? That would allow for not only the highest resolutions (which canon already holds the crown for) it would also allow for better color accuracy, and more pleasing color science (which canon also already holds the crown for). Canons colors are FAR beyond what Sony could ever wish for, which is saying alot. It's easy to build an impressive camera, but it takes true artisans to get the color to be perfect like Canon, and it's just not ever going to happen for sony. And finally, my biggest issue with sony cameras is the EXTREMELY poor ergonomics. You just cannot get a comfortable grip on the camera, and actually HURTS your hands when shooting for long periods of time. I think that's the single biggest clue that no sony photographers actually use their cameras for work, again, they're just toys that they use to parade their specs around online. Newsflash, there's more to cameras than numbers, Canon has soul.
