>>3125496>Dynamic range/highlight retention/rolloffGood digital cameras can match Portra easily
>muh resolution in any format above 645Do you really need it though? And to get the most out of it you need some serious scanning equipment.
>archival stabilityDefinitely not. You'll forever be stuck with the one original. With digital you can back up the original file as many times as you want.
>artistic credibilityI'd say that's disappeared at this point.
>practically limitless selection of fun gear to use/tryTruth. Goes back to 'fun' being one of the few actual perks.
>satisfaction of meeting the higher technical challengeWat. I suppose if you get into camera movements, etc. But digital brings its own set of technical challenges.
>financially enforced shot disciplineTruth.
>options to shoot light outside of the visible spectrumYou can convert digital cameras to do the same.
>excuse not to show people your picturesTruth.
>>3125498As I mentioned above, do you really need that resolution though? If you shoot large format for muh resolution...I really hope you print big. If not, claiming resolution is a good reason is moot.
>>3125500I don't see how this couldn't be replicated with either an extremely fast lens or a tilt-shift lens.
BTW ya'll, I'm this /fgt/ so I luv film too.
>>3124107 I think it doesn't have much perk other than being funtimes and being neato to look at in person though.
