>>4028475>in the same place as your FF 800mm f11 lens that doesn't weigh 20lbs>>4028476>>4028477Holy shit BTFO.
>>4028479>>canon - RF mount, R, RP, R5 and R6 get mogged by the G9 in Dynamic range, Maybe you should look shit up before speaking? (pic related) Even Canon's old FF sensors match/beat the G9's DR from ISO 200 up. In fairness though, if you crop for equivalent FoV you're going to lose some DR, probably putting an R5 on par with a G9.
>video features, not-overheating, menu system, IBIS, IBIS, etc>MUH IBIS!G9 has some better video features than the R6 but not better IQ. R5 has a shit ton of video features. Both the R5 and R6 have probably the best IBIS in the industry.
>>also single focal length compared to 100-400 panaleicaI mean...if you have an R5 and 100-500 you can literally just crop. G9 is a fine camera, but it doesn't "win" every use case. Neither does the R5/R6/Nikon/Sony/whatever. You need to stop shilling for a company that will never love you.
