>>4101572Yep, it's true. But those rules are so ridiculous not even the mods enforce them.
>>4101644>The accuser would have a very hard time proving that a photo was a snapshot taken without a trace amount of thoughtful composition.Even the dashboard is there getting in the way, but that wasn't my argument. My argument is that picture is not art, yet one of my favorite photos. It's so damn powerful. There's a good reason it inspired all those stories.
>On the other hand it’s very easy and quantifiable to count how many of the zero photos you post here.See
>>4098408>>4101659>"photography is not art"lol, the idea that photography isn't an art has been around since the dawn of photography. But that's not my position, my position is that photography isn't always art. And I'm not whatever boogeyman you're imagining posting that for years.
>"spray and pray" bullshit for almost 2 years now I don't have the monopoly on that term, I bet looking at the archives there's people using it since /p/ started.
>probably an /ic/ or /tv/ shillI was big into /tv/ when there was a place for cinephiles there and the staff didn't have a stick up their asses.
>He has got BTFO'd many times before>he isn't here for a discussion.Not really.
>>4101665>He's our very own resident fuckwit and he's been here for more than 2 years. But /p/tards are a thin skinned bunch with fragile egos and he gets the attention he craves. If he can't earn their admiration he will accept their hate.Wrong. Sometimes I do bait, but it's subtle, technical and I aim at brandfags and their insecurities.
>>4101726Wrong, there's art photography I dislike and non-art photography I absolutely love. Pic related, reminds me of the painting on Bateman's wall. So damn slick. But it's not art. It took balls of steel to take it, but the photographer is a passive observer in it. And yet, it's a magnificent photograph.
>>4101760See
>>4098408Basically that's all you're gonna get.
