>>4133794>cherrypicked low detail subject>downsampled pictures to further erase the 90D's advantage>altered lighting for the Pentax pic to make it look like it can get more detail in deep shadows>completely irrelevant to wildlife whatsoeverWhat a mess.
Fuji AF always sucked ass as proven by the out of focus images posted on this same board, the framerate is 15 vs 11 aka nothing to write home about, the sharper lens claim has no proof to back it up (Fuji didn't even let the usual labs test it), the X-T5 is even less durable than the X-H2.
>>4133798I know this may sound strange to a Pentaxian but there's such a thing as a stabilized lens, pic related are the controls of the Sigma I suggested. Such lenses exist for Pentax too, as a rarity. Fuji's offering relies on IBIS btw despite being a $2k lens. Optical stabilization was introduced by Canon in 1998 with the market-disrupting EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM.
>>4133801True but also you want stabilization on a long lens even at fast speeds. IBIS is inferior for long lenses but wins on wider ones. The longer the lens the more obvious the tiniest shake becomes.
