>part of a person lateposting>>3469153For the space occupied it looks to me like the subject is the waves. I think a more decise angle (30-45° from subject) would work better.
>>3469154Sunset backlighting would be more graceful in color and soft contrast. Three bands comp with strong straight lines also suggest rigidity rather than grace
>>3469155Not sure if the texture is the grain or what. I don't think it's nice to say a woman's skin is textured rather than smooth, unless you're doing some very abstract photography
>>3469156RIP in peace ac.
>>3469749Good example for above comment
>>3469750It should be a portrait, this is more apt for texture. What's with the green background?
>>3470291Is N kill?
>>3470293Too bad because he finally posted an acceptable image. Soft tones, and the cross shape with light on top deffo says "grace" in the religious meaning
>>3470317It's quite unflattering. There must be a better way to photograph a belly, even a bulgy one like this. Like sideways, at least there might be a somewhat elegant curve of a protruding belly.
>>3476801Is this you NM? I preferred the bw eye. This one is too rigid.
>>3476804I find good that everybody else is either blurred out or wearing solid colors, it makes the pattern stand out more.
>>3476807It is a sweet moment but a bit short of grace
>>3476899Ok, it's a portrait of a kinky person, so only showing part of the body without the face is message-appropriate. Bad image quality, phone? Light is rather flat and dull, you could shine it from lower and to the model's right so her left is dark and shows the shape of her side.
>>3476927It's a complicated shape. Is the top curved? A different time of day might show that, right now the shadow is uniform and it's not easy to decipher those bends. Only the tube is clearly being showed as being a tube by the reflection.
