>>3145625That's always hard math to figure out, but I often won't even shoot anything if the conditions aren't decent. Usually I'll shoot a few if the conditions are good and changing rapidly with the goal of only one final shot. And then there's always a few that just aren't very good. And then there's the matter of the only 5 to 10 photos a year (maybe less) that I would ever actually consider printing.
>>3145669I could consider if it fits into my schedule. I'm always up to something and could be just about anywhere.
>>3145677Thanks for all the detailed thoughts! Glad you like several of them Here's some responses:
>>3145419 I didn't pan to the right because the mountains that way were completely gross, just an odd angle for them.>>3145487 for the foggy shot I used Provia and an 81B warming filter, which I almost always use with Provia. I have just drum scanned that one and need to re-edit as I hope to get a little better color quality and less banding. >>3145494 I ended up with a scan about 35k pixels long. You can really up the dpi on the drum scanner if you're scanning just a portion of the sheet as it's limited to a maximum number of pixels per drum rotation. Whether or not you really get any additional detail beyond about 3k dpi is up for debate. The large print will look good at that size, but of course if you put your nose up to it the quality won't be top notch. It's going in a restaurant in Vegas so chances are I'll never see it. Provia is great for blue hour but it certainly needs a warming filter. Without it there's a good chance the blue highlights will be unusable and just too cool. The first five images in this thread were from the intrepid. I have a blog post about it on my website here:
http://www.alexburkephoto.com/blog/2017/8/25/wind-river-range-backpacking-with-the-intrepid-cameraHere's a rescan for the sake of making larger prints. Velvia 100 from 2012
