>>3944999>you are mistaking slightly higher brightness of the backdrop in the RP shot Because, drumroll here, it has a lower dynamic range, and therefore lower signal to noise, and this is visible in shots with no exposure compensation or shadow lifting applied at all, as the image posted shows. Dumbass.
>properly exposed RAW/pushing shadowsAre you saying dpreviews studio shot is incorrectly exposed? because it's not pushing shadows at all.
>Do you think more people push shadows or shoot at iso 25600push shadows anon, unquestionably push shadows. Because there's a fuck ton more room in the shadows then there is in the highlights, because digital exposes to the right.
Oh, and for your 25k iso example, I downloaded both raws, imported them into photoshop with default setting (ie, with color noise reduction set to 20) and put them side by side, which one is which anon?
Dumb motherfucker doesn;t even know how irrelevant color noise is. lmao.
