>>4254983nothing bad about them. i think they're excellent value and make solid pictures. just not my style
>>4254925thanks. i recognize that i have a relatively blase approach to spending money on niche gear. personally i think it's neat that there are many different ways to build out a kit on x mount.
spooky frame btw
>>4254986i recall an anon posting shots from the 85mm viltrox a while back. they looked great. idr if they said anything about the user experience tho. also, iirc, the pro 75 is significantly bigger than the others. here;s a shot from the 90. i mistakenly focused on the cig
