>>2636337>Leica's only reason for being is as the last rangefinder-centric camera/company. As such, the Q is irrelevant and goes against the very purpose of the brand. Once you take away the RF, you might as well get a Sony or Fuji.No, dude.
Leica is only like that because they fucked up legendarily 40+ years ago and are still crawling out of the hole.
>>2636338>please don't be that girl with the $10k camera and an old car. you'll be like the photo equivalent of guys who spend all their disposable income on jordans.Well I suppose I am, now.
I used to drive an 08 Mini Cooper but traded it in once it started having starter problems. It's trade-in value was credited towards a new BMW 3 series for my mom, and I picked up her 2013 Jetta with ~20,000 miles on it.
So yeah, I guess I do drive an old car now. :^)
