>>3403782>>3402617>you just proved that it's all a waste of your goal is to digitize You literally asked us to show you a cheap setup to digitize film.
>and you don't spend the money in a good scanner. Excuse me? You set one of your criteria's as "wasn't scanned on an expensive consumer scanner".
>yes, its shitOf course it is it's a flatbed they're dogshit for scanning 35mm and you know it. Your whole part about showing you a good quality image SOULY relying on having a good scanner. spending an extra $80 for a Plustek 8100 over the V600 will completely solve this "issue". Or you could save money and go for one of the older Plustek version like the 7200 on the second hand market place for around $150. Which both scanners have the same specs but the 8100 comes with newer software which doesn't affect the IQ.
Anyway I'll crunch some number for you developing C41 at home, using a Tetenal 1L powder kit, Fuji C200. (All pricing is from BnH)
Tetenal press 1L powder kit is $32.50 (I've managed to get up to 18 rolls out of a single kit buy pushing the times)
18 rolls of Fuji C200 is $54 ($3 per roll) (648 frames total)
So thats 32.50 divided by 648 which is $0.051, Completely blowing all the previous examples out of the water with cost and Image quality.
>pic related is expired Superia 800 scanned with a Plustek 8100>I've never shot Fuji C200 so can't give example with that filmCan post more examples if you want
