>>2915714Please, Elaborate.
Are you implying that
>The flies being sharp is unimportant?>That Iso 800 doesn't start to have a significant impact on image quality?>That aperture has no effect on ss/iso if you want to keep a good exposure?>That anti-bokeh isn't meme as fuck around here? (hint, it's a portrait)here's a copy of the 2nd image but at a narrower aperture, as you can see, the original version I posted is noticeably better. faggot. And it stands up to printing better, cos iso.
Go cry into your fuji.
