>>4476757>Why do they always have to make a fucking point and shoot.maybe because that's what people will buy. you guys keep acting like obtuse boomers about this stuff. You can still get a really advanced SLR for like $30, and those cost thousands of dollars when they were new. And since now a sandwich costs $30 it would probably cost like $5000 now even before considering all the hurdles with having to make something that hasn't been made for decades and having less than 1% of the market size for it.
A random POS late 90s Rebel would cost like $10k to make today and then everyone would complain about it and a dozen people would buy it.
At least with a P&S normies, who we already know are retarded, might waste their money on it, and that's fine with me because it keeps their hands off old cameras and it means more people are shooting film which to me is always a good thing.
>>4476759>if some chinese brand start to make real film camerasI think Seagull or Cosina still does or at least has old stock. If you look on aliexpress you can find their Minolta clones for sale.
