>>4365256Here's example #2, this time Ektachrome scanned at 10,000 ppi.
Now let's predict your retarded cope responses...
>nooooo it's not a fair test!>the tire isn't exactly the same size!The map is, same result. Odd, isn't it?
>one was shot at night!With artificial lighting fully illuminating the vehicle.
>it's not the right scanner!Drum scanners, stitched Phase One 150mp shots...feel free to post your own scanner if you think you have a better one. I'm curious to know what would qualify as better than multiple stitched 150mp Phase One shots. Electron microscope?
>noooo you used sharpening/nr/AI scalingNo, no, and no. But if it was as easy as using a plugin to demolish 6x9, how would that help 6x9 in this debate?
>but muh line chart!!!Film's resolution with real world detail is 1/2 its resolution with 1000:1 B&W line charts.
>noooo film really is best!Prove it with your own tests.
>crickets 