>>2636110>I had already gone over my thoughts on his approach to composition and OP answered defelctivelyMaybe because it was poor critique? you dismissed the fact that I had a fixed lens, therefore I had to make compromises.
>which is fine because composition and subject interest is subjective. Exposure is objective.Why mention it then? Yes exposure is objective, to an extent. And you are getting it wrong.
>Maybe your standards just aren't up to the same level as mine?You are the person who dismissed criticism saying "lol just snapshits, who cares". What an hypocrite.
What did I said in the OP? Yeah.
>OP asked for adviceDid I?
>he didn't ask for advice just from the untalented people>I'm super talented guiseSince you are either a troll (doubtful, human stupidity knows no bounds), a complete moron or just looking to pick a fight on internet forums, could you at least fuck off and stop derailing the thread?
