>>4223684All you did was post test shots, blurry garbage, and charts. "But TECHNICALLY". The closest thing to real photography you posted amounted to "i use a 24mp APS-C camera because i am not skilled enough to get closer with a 61mp FF camera". No one cares about that, it's your insufferable tech specs autism.
Look at this. Look at your pixel density = reach. This is what you are arguing for. Total incompetence.