>>4344105I'm probably biased because we've already discussed this but the fur adds so much more context, I do wish it was more on the sides though. It would make the shot feel if it was a shot from the shop of a working tanner, cause otherwise having the tufts of hair randomly in the middle of the hide makes it feel more prop-y. It means that it's a hide that wouldn't be used for anything and basically a loss for the tanner. Idk that's just my two cents.
I do like the second one more development wise too. I like the contrast? Idk what I like about it but I like it more.
Anyway, I've been revisiting some of my old shots from June and I kinda like them now. I forgot how sharp this lens is.
