>>3042300>typical canon/Nikon dslr design is as close to objectively ugly as something can getDid I say anything about those designs? And those are almost purely functional anyway. Which is what you want from a camera. It's a tool, not something you show off with pics of your EDC.
>>3042303>good designGood design fifty years ago. It serves no purpose other than "nostalgia." It looks old for the sake of looking old. For awhile Olympus avoided this trend by making m43 cameras that looked like the continued evolution of their old film forbears, but now it's just retro copying. Stepping further and further back each year.
The only companies making good looking mirrorless cameras are Sony and Leica. Sony by virtue of all their product design being focused on clean lines and functional efficiency. And Leica by virtue of iterating so slowly that they never jump on retarded bandwagon design trends. Trends like the retro bullshit Fuji started a few years ago.
