>>2634634>mid-day shot>gearfaged around the exif yet missed the most important bit>Image Created 2015:07:26 21:26:44>21:26:44>mid-day shotAlso:
>the skies completely blown outSee attached pic.
Besides, you gives a shit about the sky, it isn't the subject of the photo.
>there's no hard shadows>so I'm going to presume it was overcastAnd this is the problem with you "assuming" things, like it is mid-day - you're wrong. The skies were clear, we were in the shadow of a building.
>Also, listen to what the other guy has been telling youI'm getting the feeling you both are the same person, but giving you the benefit of the doubt... should I listen to a moron who says images are "wonky", meaning uneven horizon, when I took the pictures using the virtual horizon of the camera? if the perspective is funny is solely because of the lens distortion. Or maybe I should listen to you, the person who got completely wrong the situation of the exposure?
This board is a wonderful example of the Dunning–Kruger effect.
