>>3297246I don't see that in global or /p/ rules. /s/ appears to have such a rule. I have posted a few here and have seen a couple other posters do so without stirring up controversy. Caveat: Be that as it may, I was hammered once for posting a pic of Dawn's younger daughter on /b/ as it was deemed 1) a "child model" and 2) a "sexualized image", despite the fact that the photo was just of her simply standing fully clothed in my den, and was included in their family album kept on their coffee table.
I can see the logic of policing the board so as to disallow threads dedicated to young actresses or Dance Mom girls, but sharing of tasteful cute innocent photos actually taken by /p/ should at least be tolerated. I won First Place in a contest earlier this month with an entry of a girl with a lollipop but don't feel like I could share my winning shot on this photography board as it might be thought to reach the "suggestive" or "provocative" level on the scale of innocence. But here is one by Bert Stern. Note: actress Sue Lyon was 18 in this pic.
