>>4161187>It is a cropped crop. The megapixels, however dense, are just showing more blurry shit. A longer focal length is the only real reach you have available, unlike high res FF which lets you crop and apply AI scaling to smooth out the result as well as higher pixel densities on consumer lenses (all crop sensors are subsets of larger sensors so long as the MP count of the cropped large format is half or more of the small format)Yours is a coped cope. You can use the same long lenses on MFT. There's exactly four full frame cameras that can match the reach of a $700 Panasonic or Olympus: Sigma fp L, Leica M11, Sony a7RIV, Sony a7RV. The cheapest is the Sigma, $2500 without viewfinder. That's almost 4 times the price of the MFT camera.
>Canon already caught up. It’s a gimmick anyways except for amateur video.Yeah, at what price? And in one of the models the IBIS and OIS didn't work together well at all causing all kinds of problems, I think they fixed it in firmware already though.
>Small camera, lots of huge lenses, or forego what little reach you had with smaller, softer optics. Not ergonomic at all. Small cameras are most ergonomic with small lenses.Ergonomics aren't limited to the grip. The only other camera I've seen with flip out screen AND articulated EVF is the Blackmagic 6K. And that one is for cinefags, you can't even take pics with it and look at them without plugging it into a computer. But truth be told, even with all that reach I wouldn't buy a MFT. I'm loyal to DSLRs. Pic related doesn't have much reach potential but it tempts me.
