>>4010186I'd be astounded if they don't at least release a red-saturated film *called* kodachrome in the next few years. It's their historic flagship product and the hype would be insane. From what I've read, the chemicals weren't exceptionally toxic. They were just unprofitable to produce with the existing equipment and the development costs were high since it required 3 different development steps and red re-exposure. Even if it cost $50 a roll to shoot and develop I'm pretty sure aesthetic zoomers would be tripping over themselves to shoot it though.
