>>3556535>>I noticed in your pic you pitted a Fuji lens against a mft lens with a 1 stop slower equiv aperture.>You don't multiply aperture you fucking idiot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5zN6NVx-hY>>Fuji sensor has 141.7 additional square mm of surface area gathering light. That's why it's better at high ISO>ISO differences are imperceptible.Only to a blind man.
>muh noiseApparently you can't use native Olympus glass either:
>>3556530>>We were talking about the X-T3. Improved AF was cited as one of the major changes.>That was just a typo, I still meant the XT3. It's CAF is still absolute garbage, it's SAF is still slow.I have had the chance to handle the XPro2 and XT3 and neither was slow.
>>No one covers water exposure under warranty.>Olympus does.Pic related from the E-M5 mark II manual.
>>Prices the lenses in pic.>Now look at their performance!Find a site that compares them side by side in controlled tests.
>every single M.Zuiko lens from the kit lenses up are all completely silent. Every single one of them.All evidence to the contrary:
>>3556530 