>>2576789Yeah, as I said, I'm much more interested in printing a few of these. Pic related is a couple of test prints. As I said, I ended up printing the snake at a higher grade than what you see here, turned out good. Posted it to my sister in London, so I can't show you. The print of the fan was the last sheet from my very first pack of paper, you can see it's badly fogged.
>but I could do with a little less underexposureI never underexpose colour neg film where there's enough light. Metered these for the grass at ISO 100. The contrast is all processing.
>Are you tall?6'2". I was about 5 steps up though. I disagree, it wouldn't be the same photo from lower down. Too much window, not enough backs, and lacking the drama from the wide angle distortion of the doorframe.
>ClichéSometimes I wake up in the morning and want to start my day with some FB likes.
